A short while ago, on the paid propaganda blog Carbon Brief, Mz Pidcock wrote an article with the title
New satellite reveals places on Earth most at risk from ocean acidification
The active map shown is screen captured here:
I can't locate the original caption, but the revised caption says it's of alkalinity. It's not, and even after being informed it's of Salinity and changing the caption TO alkalinity she's not corrected it to read salinity.
The Story was picked up by Grist, before ANY corrections were made, so a graphic of changes in salinity is being interpreted as horrid ocean acidification.
There's more on this story at Imablawg, but this kind of post misleading story without fact checking is becoming a habit with Ms. Pidcock it seems.
In her rush to discredit those who are sceptical of consensus science, Ms Pidcock posted an article: which she has since revised, which included false information about Dr. Susan Crockford.
Dr Crockford's comments from twitter:
Carbon Brief http://t.co/oJo940ZyOi tries to defend #polarbears are doomed message, afraid people find my perspective the most plausible
— Susan Crockford (@sjc_pbs) March 5, 2015
@RozPidcock @sjc_pbs U repeat misinformation about my background & lies re funding for my blog & say that's honorable? Just childish
— Susan Crockford (@sjc_pbs) March 5, 2015
@RozPidcock If you'd read my "About" page you'd know: no one pays me to blog about #polarbears: not Heartland, not anyone.
— Susan Crockford (@sjc_pbs) March 5, 2015
@clim8resistance @tan123 No, I was not contacted. I am a zoologist, I specialize in animal evolution, including dogs and #polarbears
— Susan Crockford (@sjc_pbs) March 5, 2015
Mz Pidcock changed the original post after the exchanges, the revised post is located at:polar bear post
Changes include:
Replacing this outdated map
with the newer polar bear habitat map
Replacing text:
and leaving misleading statements about Dr. Crockford in place.
Thanks to Dr. Crockford for assistance compiling this post.
Roz Pidcock replied on twitter, seemingly unable to post reply here:
I replied on twitter:
Hmmm. @RozPidcock http://t.co/sZJNnPIuBH Perhaps ESA has mislabeled this too then.
http://t.co/OLcXOE0Wrw pic.twitter.com/iaku8XKGaF
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
Is misrepresentation the new norm in #ClimateScience, at least of the #Catastrophist camp? @RozPidcock Hard to tell from these.
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
@RozPidcock
BTW, your new post disappeared, there's no moderation on, no idea why your posts keep getting eaten.
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
You might also read the post on your blog by Jean-Pierre Gattuso @RozPidcock http://t.co/XDF64o1XWy and http://t.co/fHJ0sLId1H ref salinity
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
Dr Crawford sent me .doc files which I screen capped, posted here re changes to your polar bear article, @RozPidcock I'm hopeful she will
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
@RozPidcock respond to in more depth. She's the zoological specialist, I leave that to her. Re your title, when you stop post and correct
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
with regard to basic information, I'll use the title. To me the title is one of respect which I find many in ClimateScience @RozPidcock
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
unworthy of. @RozPidcock
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
BTW, in the copy of the original article which I have, there are numerous locations where you omit her title. @RozPidcock pot/kettle?
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) March 8, 2015
UPDATE!
At it again:
Carbon Brief does it again, post unresearched article, correct after caught. Habit? http://t.co/2h37CjR9qb http://t.co/WP1AFHhwba
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) April 3, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment