UPDATE! Greg Laden of deniers list infamy Threatening Roger Pielke Jr:
Here is @gregladen threatening me --> https://t.co/ZU5FUN4jjl
"So just go back to your research and enjoy your academic freedom"
WTF?
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 27, 2015
UFB @gregleden just sent me a threat. Advising me to get a lawyer & warning that he and others are coming after me. What is with these guys?
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 27, 2015
Should science underwritten by industries w/ $ at stake in #climate debate be allowed to influence Congress? NO! http://t.co/kouiyKfmQx
— Raul M. Grijalva (@RepRaulGrijalva) February 24, 2015
It seems that Rep Grijalva forgot to mention he is on a fishing trip to 7 Universities, intimidating respected scientists with many hundreds of peer reviewed papers between them, congressional requests sent to the institutions they work for.
BTW, Pure as the driven snow @RepRaulGrijalva didn't disclose to any of the scientists he's McCarthying the $78,854 he's taken from environmental lobbying groups.
This appears coordinated with attack letters from OFA, BarackObama.com.
As a life-long lover of science and freedom of speech, I felt compelled to respond to Grijalva:
Your actions in regard to Dr Curry and Pielke are despicable. @RepRaulGrijalva
as are these letters from #OFA pic.twitter.com/0U4ohRhW8K
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
Dr's Pielke and Curry reported accurately on UN #IPCC conclusions. @RepRaulGrijalva Dr Holdren advocated sterilants in people's water.
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
This attack on #Science, #Scientific Method, #Universities & 2 courageous scientists is despised, cowardly, unworthy of US.@RepRaulGrijalva
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
The #UN #IPCC is founded by the UNFCCC which by DEFINITION defines natural causes out of #ClimateChange. @RepRaulGrijalva & by admission is
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
working to end capitalism. You are working to further socialism, destroy science and stifle freedom of thought & speech @RepRaulGrijalva
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
Virtually ALL Universities receive money frm Fossil fuel companies, mining industry, banking. @RepRaulGrijalva Witch hunt against them next?
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
I'm so disgusted by your despicable, intimidating actions I can't even type coherently. @RepRaulGrijalva This is NOT AMERICAN but Lysenkoism
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
This is something I would have expected to see coming from Maoist China, Russia under Khruschchev. @RepRaulGrijalva NOT THE US Congress
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
What next, @RepRaulGrijalva, will you be calling for DHS to visit universities to cart away scientists with differing yet valid opinions?
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
The massed weight of the Congress is NOT to be used to stifle #Scientific Debate. @RepRaulGrijalva NEVER Mr. Grijalva.
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
The organ of the office of the PRESIDENT should be CENSURED for using holocaust referencing language re Ayotte. @RepRaulGrijalva Orwellian.
— Ima Debatin' (@ImaBannedd) February 24, 2015
Many scientists in the field are weighing in on this despicable act by Congresscritter Grijalva, more reaction will be posted as time permits, pertinent comments found:
Michael Tobis:
Good. Is it a rule? If not, make it so. If so, enforce it going forward. Do not harass academics! @climatehawks @RogerPielkeJr
— mtobis (@mtobis) February 24, 2015
Meanwhile, Michael Mann has no real comment of substance:
@A_Siegel @RogerPielkeJr @LabradorIce Thanks -)
— Michael E. Mann (@MichaelEMann) February 24, 2015
Robert Way being sensible:
@RogerPielkeJr
This debacle really gains nothing for science. Soon was a different situation than this altogether. Ppl allowed to disagree.
— Robert Way (@LabradorIce) February 24, 2015
From Bob Ward, with ClimateBrad Johnson trying to excuse the inexcusable:
Politicians should not persecute academics with whom they disagree. No ifs or buts.
— Bob Ward (@ret_ward) February 24, 2015
I have my differences with @RogerPielkeJr but @RepRaulGrijalva is absolutely wrong to make baseless allegations about his funding.
— Bob Ward (@ret_ward) February 24, 2015
@climatebrad Isn't @RepRaulGrijalva assuming that because he dislikes @RogerPielkeJr he must have undeclared vested financial interest?
— Bob Ward (@ret_ward) February 24, 2015
@climatebrad That is not how @RepRaulGrijalva's letter reads. He objects to content of @RogerPielkeJr's testimony, then questions funding.
— Bob Ward (@ret_ward) February 24, 2015
and Gerry Morrow & others add comments:
@ret_ward @GaspeBRreporter @climatebrad @RepRaulGrijalva @RogerPielkeJr Tx Bob RPJr's integrity isn't doubted by anyone. but politicos.
— Gerry Morrow (@GerryMorrow) February 24, 2015
Is he going to check on Tom Steyer's corporate interests? @ret_ward @climatebrad @RepRaulGrijalva @RogerPielkeJr @RyanMaue
— Climate Resilient MJ (@mjrod) February 24, 2015
@ret_ward @RyanMaue @climatebrad @RogerPielkeJr An outrageous attempt to chill free speech, scientific debate and intimidate dissenters.
— Howard Wiseman (@HowSmart) February 24, 2015
Simon Donner replies to Ward:
@ret_ward @RogerPielkeJr @RepRaulGrijalva Bob took the words right out of my mouth. The investigation is unfair and unwarranted.
— Simon Donner (@simondonner) February 24, 2015
From Judith Curry and David Lea:
@curryja @RogerPielkeJr @Revkin This has a really unsavory flavor to it and opens up a huge can of worms. @MichaelEMann perspective useful?
— David Lea (@DavidWLea) February 24, 2015
From Alex H, USThermophysics:
@RyanMaue A politician expressing sanctimony over the corrupting influence of someone else's funding. The irony is almost too much to bear.
— Alex H (@USthermophysics) February 24, 2015
Why didn't @RepRaulGrijalva disclose the $78,854 he's taken from environmental lobbying groups in his letters to @RogerPielkeJr & @curryja?
— Alex H (@USthermophysics) February 24, 2015
From Ryan Maue:
Talk about a "can of worms" ... do Dems really want Congress also looking into funding of climate alarmists as well. Chilling.
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
@DavidWLea public has right to know regardless how state or federal govt employees are funded. Look at Jonathan Gruber fraudulent billing.
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
Get your popcorn! Dem pol "investigating" @RogerPielkeJr highlights false statements or "fibs" made by Holdren
http://t.co/DSXzAuReHU
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
Scoreboard is already @RogerPielkeJr 1 Holdren 0 ... pic.twitter.com/2ibCroC1pW
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
For climate skeptics, request by Congress is dream come true.
Replace Prof @RogerPielkeJr w/any climate scientist. pic.twitter.com/vcpCkxERMR
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
There's more: Outside funding! This is the Mother lode.
Penn State, MIT et al. may need to hire full-time staff. pic.twitter.com/tUonZPKv2s
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
Interesting decision by @RepRaulGrijalva to establish precedent: if u testify about climate science in Congress, you will get investigated.
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
Rather than waste paper on such responses, GOP majority on committee should personally invite those scientists to Washington to speak.
— RY (@RyanMaue) February 24, 2015
via Paul Matthews:
If any investigation is needed, it's where @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff is getting his misinformation from.
— Paul Matthews (@etzpcm) February 24, 2015
From Andy Revkin:
Seeing @repraulgrijalva request for @rogerpielkejr finances, would he be okay with @jiminhofe doing same for others http://t.co/6DhAlsTobN
— Andy Revkin (@Revkin) February 24, 2015
and an update, response to critic:
@mateosfo Targeted harassment. Exxon, BP $ flow to heaps of climate/energy scientists at Stanford, Princeton, e.g. Why not them, too?
— Andy Revkin (@Revkin) February 24, 2015
and Jonathan Jones:
Anyone interested in what @RogerPielkeJr believes should read his books eg http://t.co/N7snv1PAY2 This witch hunt is utterly disgraceful
— Jonathan Jones (@nmrqip) February 24, 2015
Richard Betts of the MET:
@GerryMorrow It isn't and it doesn't. This is obviously political, not scientific. @etzpcm @RogerPielkeJr @curryja
— Richard Betts (@richardabetts) February 24, 2015
and Ben Pyle responds:
@richardabetts @GerryMorrow @etzpcm @RogerPielkeJr @curryja It was obviously political from the outset, and cli-scis didn't spot it.
— Ben Pile (@clim8resistance) February 24, 2015
Jonathan Jones has been subject to this before, but not by the US Government:
@ValidScience the CRU team conspired to get me fired over my FOI request. Not good. @sueimdone @BarryJWoods
— Jonathan Jones (@nmrqip) February 24, 2015
My Coblog weighs in:
@sueimdone @CardsFanTX @Balinteractive Indeed. Once again, the dems yielded the high ground of harassing scientists and made it acceptable.
— intrepid wanders (@intrepidwanders) February 24, 2015
and Jaime Jessup:
I think we just passed a watershed. #globalwarming advocates have now abandoned challenging the scientific views of their opponents.
— Jaime Jessop (@Balinteractive) February 24, 2015
From Roger Pielke Jr himself:
So read this carefully.
I am being investigated by Congress for presenting in testimony per-reviewed science 100% consistent with the IPCC
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 24, 2015
My email strangely quiet from MSM reporters covering climate ;-) They know this "investigation" is drilling a dry hole.
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 24, 2015
A claim that will open a Congressional investigation: ""It is incorrect to associate the increasing costs of disasters with rising GHGs"
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 24, 2015
Via Tom Nelson:
GREEN SCARE: Democrats Launch Campaign To Out ‘Climate Deniers’ | The Daily Caller http://t.co/R8YaCG7Skd
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) February 24, 2015
From Steve Goddard's timeline:
Lefty Ariz. Congressman Grijalva going after UNIVERSITY-AFFILIATED climate skeptics. via Politico #Like1933Germany pic.twitter.com/s81aAIiEqu
— JunkScience.com (@JunkScience) February 24, 2015
The filthy behavior of @nytimes and @washingtonpost in pursuing witch hunts against scientists - is something we didn't expect to see again.
— Steve Goddard (@SteveSGoddard) February 24, 2015
The @WhiteHouse and @BarackObama have gone full Stalin, engaged in attacks on individuals
https://t.co/XNuPTZMPRR pic.twitter.com/kAUgKINkJa
— Steve Goddard (@SteveSGoddard) February 24, 2015
The @BarackObama climate inquisition has officially begun. Straight out of the dark ages.
https://t.co/XNuPTZMPRR pic.twitter.com/E07kjlrz3V
— Steve Goddard (@SteveSGoddard) February 24, 2015
Former Gore advisor Kalee Kreider, reply by Roger Tallbloke
@Revkin @Ben_Geman @RogerPielkeJr Mr. Vitter seems ready for hearings on green funding too.Wld rather see bipartisan legislating from all.
— Kalee Kreider (@kaleekreider) February 24, 2015
@kaleekreider @Revkin @Ben_Geman @RogerPielkeJr Kalee could tell us about Mr Gore's funding of the case in UK Vs lorry driver too. #snigger
— Rog Tallbloke (@RogTallbloke) February 24, 2015
@kaleekreider @Revkin @Ben_Geman @RogerPielkeJr Good plan, then we'll see relative funding amounts of both sides. Which will be a laugh.
— Rog Tallbloke (@RogTallbloke) February 24, 2015
And to Richard Betts:
@richardabetts @wattsupwiththat @Foxgoose @etzpcm @RogerPielkeJr @curryja Can you show me whose money built CRU? Clue: #RoyalDutchShell
— Rog Tallbloke (@RogTallbloke) February 24, 2015
and to the esteemed congress critter Grijalva:
@ImaBannedd "Dear Congressman Grijalva, please don't ask again, as being told to FUCK OFF sometimes offends. Very respectfully - Faculty"
— Rog Tallbloke (@RogTallbloke) February 24, 2015
Pertinent, concise. hilarious.
Snark from Brad Keyes:
Even .@ret_ward knows better than to defend it.
Your McCarthyist Fishing Expedition May Have Turned Into An Anti-Science Witch Hunt When...
— Climate Nuremberg (@BradPKeyes) February 24, 2015
From Paul Matthews, with replies:
Barack McCarthy launches witch-hunt against @RogerPielkeJr via henchman @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff
http://t.co/0tJOyzQtyb
— Paul Matthews (@etzpcm) February 24, 2015
And a similar ill-informed attack by @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff on @curryja
http://t.co/Q0bNRAz7QQ
for statement consistent with IPCC
— Paul Matthews (@etzpcm) February 24, 2015
@etzpcm As Holdren (named in email) is the only one making statements against IPCC science... maybe his finances should be looked at?
— Chris Baker (@Zacnaloen) February 24, 2015
@etzpcm @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff @curryja You will find this is coordinated via Organizing for Action. They warned they will attack
— Gene Gore (@GeneGore21) February 24, 2015
Dear @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff, here is the IPCC report summary
http://t.co/0dnljCxYWo
Read what it says on extreme weather
@curryja
— Paul Matthews (@etzpcm) February 24, 2015
@etzpcm @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff @curryja And in the process cause innocent people immeasurable distress and professional harm.
— Chris Baker (@Zacnaloen) February 24, 2015
If any investigation is needed, it's where @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff is getting his misinformation from.
— Paul Matthews (@etzpcm) February 24, 2015
@etzpcm Yes, the letters look identical except for that omission and name replacement.
— Chris Baker (@Zacnaloen) February 24, 2015
@etzpcm @RepRaulGrijalva @GrijalvaStaff @curryja Grijalva won't let facts get in the way of a good witchhunt. #JeSuisDrCurry
— Terry Koch (@tkoch_a) February 24, 2015
Washinton Post gives more details of Raul McCarthy Grijalva @RepRaulGrijalva's witch hunt.
— Paul Matthews (@etzpcm) February 24, 2015
Eric Stieg:
@RogerPielkeJr Welcome to the new McCarthyism. Congress should not be able to investigate on a whim. You have my *unequivocal* support.
— Eric Steig (@ericsteig) February 24, 2015
Via Sundance regarding @RepRaulGrijalva's mostly union funding. near 200k!
@GTMGQ @RogTallbloke @ImaBannedd Nothing like mob run union stooge to lead the fight for academic COI. ;-) http://t.co/cFoUyalNM2
— Sundance (@0Sundance) February 24, 2015
From Foxgoose:
.@richardabetts @etzpcm @RogerPielkeJr @curryja @wattsupwiththat Seems a natural progression from Slingo enforcing her "loyalty statement".
— Foxgoose (@Foxgoose) February 24, 2015
.@theresphysics @wattsupwiththat @richardabetts @etzpcm @RogerPielkeJr @curryja "Hounding" for data isn't the same as "hounding" for finance
— Foxgoose (@Foxgoose) February 24, 2015
From Andrew Branca:
Progressive fascists seek to crush dissenters with same fervor as jihadists behead infidels, stone rape victims, hang gays. RT @ImaBannedd
— Law of Self Defense (@LawSelfDefense) February 24, 2015
From William Briggs:
GREEN SCARE: Democrats Launch Campaign To Out 'Climate Deniers' http://t.co/5PTOQ2mzxB Blinded by insane obsession.
— William M. Briggs (@mattstat) February 24, 2015
1) House Natural Resources ranking member Raul Grijalva is asking universities to disclose financial information for seven researchers
— William M. Briggs (@mattstat) February 24, 2015
2) whose work has been championed by skeptics of man-made climate change.
— William M. Briggs (@mattstat) February 24, 2015
3) From Politico (no link). But he won't be asking those who received government money, which in his mind is extra virgin pure.
— William M. Briggs (@mattstat) February 24, 2015
Seems Jim Bouldin has issues with Pielke Jr, accepts others as collateral Damage.
@ret_ward @etzpcm @RogerPielkeJr @RepRaulGrijalva
What goes around comes back around Bob.
— Jim Bouldin (@jim_bouldin) February 24, 2015
Andy Skuce, SkS blog contributor:
@curryja I think this is overreach and smacks of intimidation tactics. Good luck.
— Andy Skuce (@andyskuce) February 25, 2015
Pielke Jr on Christie Congressional Request:
Arizona congressman asking questions about outside funding for UAH climate expert John Christy http://t.co/j9AQfu0NGF
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 25, 2015
From Pielke's pen:
https://theclimatefix.wordpress.com/2015/02/25/i-am-under-investigation/
Disgustingly enough, the constant attacks on Dr Pielke have had desired results:
Richard Betts links the UCS post
Halperin prevaricates re Pielke's science.
Gavin Schmidt has this to say:
Congress does have an important oversight role, but using mechanisms of federal/state power to intimidate scientists is an abuse (1/n)
— Gavin Schmidt (@ClimateOfGavin) February 25, 2015
This statement from Robert Brulle:
@ClimateOfGavin "Investigation" by Rep. Grijalva totally inappropriate - targeted investigation based on content of these individuals work
— Robert Brulle (@RBrulle) February 25, 2015
Via Barry Woods:
Will the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund be mobilizing to aid these scientists? @AGW_Prof @richardabetts
— Alex H (@USthermophysics) February 25, 2015
Dr. Scott 'super' Mandia seems FINE with having a new inquisition run on heretics & those who disagree on minor points:
Democrats Target Climate-Deniers-for-Hire http://t.co/2emaht99oK via @tnr
— Scott A Mandia (@AGW_Prof) February 25, 2015
Democrats Target Climate-Deniers-for-Hire http://t.co/2emaht99oK via @tnr
— Scott A Mandia (@AGW_Prof) February 25, 2015
which is one of the most disgusting and prevaricating posts I have ever seen from an alleged Scientist. Here's Mandia's selfie of him 'saving the planet'.
Narcissistic?
Katie Hopkins:
I am increasingly struck that people no longer celebrate the strength of opposing views. But wish for a consensus around their opinion.
— Katie Hopkins (@KTHopkins) February 25, 2015
David Rose:
Shocking account by @RogerPielkeJr of the McCarthyite witch-hunt against him by a leading Congressional Democrat http://t.co/xLIt5PD3zJ
— David Rose (@DavidRoseUK) February 25, 2015
James Wilsdon:
This spurious “investigation” of @RogerPielkeJr by US congressman @RepRaulGrijalva is a disgrace https://t.co/nTuIyJYtPu
— James Wilsdon (@jameswilsdon) February 25, 2015
via WUWT and Les Johnson:
@wattsupwiththat Examples include Koch funding BEST; Exxon giving Stanford climate research 100 million; Koch supporting 256 universities
— Les Johnson (@LesJohnsonHrvat) February 23, 2015
Indicative of the reason for the step up in demonizing Climate Scientists who do not foresee calamity, the US Government new guidelines to all federal agencies does not mention temperature.
The only thing to be mentioned specifically is CO2.
From Paul Matthews:
. @RogerPielkeJr is under “Investigation”
https://t.co/HfwbdjaqLE
by @NRDems witch-finder and merchant of smear @RepRaulGrijalva
— Paul Matthews (@etzpcm) February 25, 2015
From Craig Rucker:
Harassment prompts skeptic scientist to stop his research debunking climate hype – Dr. Roger Pielke Jr http://t.co/wDHSRqUrJG
— Craig Rucker (@CJRucker) February 25, 2015
From Steven F Hayward, another of the witch hunt victims:
The climate McCarthyites have come up with a Blacklist, and I'm proud to be on it! http://t.co/QHQ5w80Uym #climatechange @powerlineUS
— Steven F. Hayward (@stevenfhayward) February 25, 2015
Another Democrat witch hunter chimes in, with comment from Leo Hickman:
This could get interesting. Curious to know how this list was put together http://t.co/U26y0e4RW9 @SenMarkey @SenWhitehouse @EPWBoxer
— Leo Hickman (@LeoHickman) February 25, 2015
Strongest statement yet from Richard Betts:
In my view, scientists should stand together against political intimidation from any side. We'll sort out scientific disagreements ourselves
— Richard Betts (@richardabetts) February 25, 2015
Climate Wire gets into the discussion here:
Judith Curry has a post on her blog regarding this witch hunt by Grijalva.
He knows and has known her funding, esp as she was a Democrat witness in the past.
I strongly recommend reading her post.
Link to Milloy website, info on Grijalva witch hunt on Dr. Lindzen
Shocking letter of intimidation from Congressman to MIT re climate skeptic Richard Lindzen | http://t.co/bOMLZqvzXw http://t.co/5q2bBB9Bgz
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) February 25, 2015
From Benjamin Riley:
This is an outrage. @RepRaulGrijalva is attacking @RogerPielkeJr. What is happening to intellectual debate in US? https://t.co/JXv466y7cc
— Benjamin Riley (@benjaminjriley) February 25, 2015
Appreciate the RTs, but I support @RogerPielkeJr 's right to offer his opinion on climate change, full stop.
— Benjamin Riley (@benjaminjriley) February 25, 2015
More from Roger Pielke Jr, to Judith Curry:
Judy Curry "It looks like it is ‘open season’ on anyone who deviates even slightly from the consensus." I agree http://t.co/GRA7VHAFM8
— Roger A. Pielke Sr (@RogerAPielkeSr) February 25, 2015
PhD student speaks out:
This has got to be an early April fools? @RogerPielkeJr under investigation for having a backbone and character? https://t.co/czogmjF1XJ
— Samuel Tang (@SWSTang_) February 25, 2015
More from Revkin of Dot Earth blog:
Finding lots of scientists supporting @RogerPielkeJr pushback against @RepRaulGrijalva probe. https://t.co/jf2vcv2Vvz @dotearth soon.
— Andy Revkin (@Revkin) February 25, 2015
From Roger Pielke Sr:
Political environment "If you have scientific results that counters our agenda, we will go after you" Irregardless of robustness of science
— Roger A. Pielke Sr (@RogerAPielkeSr) February 25, 2015
CHILLING “..who has published widely..testified..impact on policy in..scientific community”
https://t.co/sdY2RyIAKA pic.twitter.com/M7P8QDiHKA
— Roger A. Pielke Sr (@RogerAPielkeSr) February 25, 2015
From Bob Ryan:
@RogerPielkeJr Pretty scary fishing expedition http://t.co/Ge5OVrYFZv AMS - Freedom of Scientific Expression https://t.co/ull0loIKFZ
— Bob Ryan (@BobRyanCCM) February 24, 2015
From Thomas Crockett:
@RogerPielkeJr Pretty scary fishing expedition http://t.co/Ge5OVrYFZv AMS - Freedom of Scientific Expression https://t.co/ull0loIKFZ
— Bob Ryan (@BobRyanCCM) February 24, 2015
From Junk Science, link to Terence Corcoran:
Here's @TerenceCorcoran's pithy summary of warmism's pathetic science & anti-skeptic jihad: http://t.co/1tUdi7QSvH pic.twitter.com/M32MbvtVYg
— JunkScience.com (@JunkScience) February 26, 2015
Stephen Hayward links Politico post by Richard Lowry
Rich Lowry nails it w/ "Shameful Climate Witch Hunt." #FretheGrijalva7! http://t.co/2Pjstxb5s5
— Steven F. Hayward (@stevenfhayward) February 26, 2015
And another highly critical article denouncing the Inquisition against Climate Science heresy appears:
ICYMI - Democratic lawmaker faces backlash after targeting climate skeptic researchers http://t.co/YmPr2FboXF via @Ben_Geman
— Dan Berman (@DHBerman) February 26, 2015
End times for warmists: "hunting witches and burning them to keep their theories of [AGW] alive" http://t.co/hPjY4PaKte
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) February 26, 2015
Another takeaway from Politico story:
"the alarmists have hounded a serious researcher out of the climate business. All hail science!" http://t.co/zVtCRbFbvH
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) February 26, 2015
And Derek Sorenson links Paul Homewood:
"The threat is clear. If you dare to disagree with any part of Obama’s strategy, we will come after you." http://t.co/dNz6FTnXdJ
— Derek Sorensen (@th3Derek) February 26, 2015
One of the better comments I've seen to date:
There's only one accused in Massachusetts (Lindzen), but the latest #climate witchhunt bears all the hallmarks of Salem, Massachusetts, 1692
— Jaime Jessop (@Balinteractive) February 26, 2015
The American Association of University Professors, Mikey Mann and other responses here:
And more blowback:
"Climate McCarthyism is Wrong Whether Democratic or Republican" http://t.co/TRRlv4hOyd
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) February 27, 2015
from 'The Breakthrough Org'
“@RepRaulGrijalva’s beef with Pielke is plainly ideological.” http://t.co/md32Y5Py8W via @TheBTI
— Alex Trembath (@atrembath) February 27, 2015
James Delingpole's take:
.@JamesDelingpole: If AGW case is so clear-cut, why desperate half-baked smears on skeptics? http://t.co/l3ptZb0Ct3 pic.twitter.com/BsbvosobIi
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) February 27, 2015
And more blowback:
on @RepRaulGrijalva act http://t.co/o8zptgwD2U "I cant imagin message being sent 2 younger scientists” @RogerPielkeJr http://t.co/q7ghWYd579
— Max Boykoff (@boykoff) February 27, 2015
FOIA filed against U Delaware:
And more from the American Meteorological Society:
A very good letter from the American Meteorological Society on Grijalva's witch hunt http://t.co/HHomWJkmWH
— Judith Curry (@curryja) February 27, 2015
The Arizona Republic on Grijalva's witch hunt:
The Arizona republic columnist @MacEachernDoug-->Green McCarthyism: Grijalva smears scientist http://t.co/CWbI0rKSRr via @azcentral
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 27, 2015
More from Roger Pielke Jr:
Nuanced, thoughtful from @keithkloor-> How to Balance Transparency with Academic Freedom? - Collide-a-Scape http://t.co/Wz4RaQV3Ns
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 27, 2015
Latest update, Greg Laden threatening Roger Pielke Jr.:
Here is @gregladen threatening me --> https://t.co/ZU5FUN4jjl
"So just go back to your research and enjoy your academic freedom"
WTF?
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) February 27, 2015
Sorry, this is a long comment and veers off topic a bit.
ReplyDeleteWatching here in the UK with a more limited experience and exposure of US politics it seemed to be inevitable that the wholedebacle would explode into political infighting as the money involved is seriously huge (compared to UK) and money drives politics. Here in the UK the political consensus is still with the CAGW proponents excepting UKIP and a few MP's without portfolio (Owen Patterson being the alienated voice within the Conservatives) and whilst a lot of money is at stake (subsidies to wind & solar farm landowners) it is not of the magnitude of the States. Whilst the two main parties believe the public will vote for "green" policies they will adopt them, especially if they can benefit those funding their political party.
So where is the science? Politicians tell us we must suffer a hole in our pocket and rape our landscape because the science tells us. But science also tells us we don't need to but is ignored.
I have huge respect for scientists such as Roger Pielke Jr and Judith Curry even if I am not totally convinced of their entire position. Roger's book "Disasters & Climate Change" should be 1st reading for all politicians who have to deal with the aftermath of weather events. Winter in the UK 2013/14 being a case in point where Julia Slingo of the Met Office made appalling statements about a series of winter storms and Somerset flooding was consequently reported as a result of climate change rather than (what all the locals knew) poor management of drainage in a land at or below sea level. After all, the Levels is a man made landscape which needs to be managed.
So where am I going with this? One question that occurred to me was: Why now? Why launch this McCarthistic witch hunt at this time? What initiated the motivation? Now, I'm not aware of much of what is being said or reported in the States and very little is reported here, but two things occur to me. The poorly reported scandal happening in the IPCC with allegations against Dr Pachauri and his subsequent resignation, and the state of the winter in the US for the 2nd year running and worse than last.
This process is not chance. This has been thought out, discussed and decided upon before initiation as detailed in the e-mails Steve Goddard has published on Real Science. This is purely political but I cannot believe that there isn't a finger of those whose livelihood is at stake if their work is proved flawed. The last and current winter is a real problem, cold records being broken, snowfall records being broken, lake ice etc. And it happened last year too, so lives in people’s memories more readily, "winters did not used to be like this". So stupid claims were made, blizzards caused by warming etc but as meteorologists such as Joe Bastardi rip apart such claims, it seems there begins a panic leading to malicious intent. Coupled with serious doubts over the integrity of the IPCC's climate change leader, decisions were made to discredit "skeptics" who clearly had valid points on the climate situation.
Such a disgusting process that has now started may, in my opinion, result in a growing disassociation from the "Gore Machine" by scientists who, whilst proponents of CAGW, will shrink back. A scrutiny of the earnings and source of funding for those who control the "Science" in the public arena, a slow, but accelerating move by media to switch it's bias and a collapse of the whole consensus to a more balanced position. The opposite of what is intended. This will take time however but the actions against the integrity of honourable scientists WILL backfire. Possibly in a very big way but more likely in a slow reversal of positions accelerated by a change of leadership in USA within 2 years.
A cornered dog will bite, these are the actions of a cornered dog. The irony is, they have put themselves in that cul de sac and there is no way out but to take as many of your "enemies" with you.
Long, but a well worth reading ;-)
DeleteI believe the impetus of this "...thought out, and discussed..." plan was the exceptional cold in the eastern and middle states. It is distracting from their "message".
A great story of this nonsense of BAD advise from an even worse science:
http://www.marinelink.com/news/subcommittee-highlights373624.aspx